<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Optimising sites for search engines by Retiarius Internet Design &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/tag/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com</link>
	<description>Search engine optimisation (SEO) techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash! and their site was gone!</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Retiarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web site design techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shockwave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to my earlier post on not using frames, a company of my acquaintance had a nicely search engine  optimised site. It then seems that someone offered to update their site with a new, experimental, &#8216;jazzy and upbeat&#8217; look. As this was for free they accepted and the new &#8216;designer&#8217; immediately dumped the existing site [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Google oblivion to page 1 in 2 weeks for homeopathic vet site</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2010/05/05/from-google-oblivion-to-page-1-in-2-weeks-for-homeopathic-vet-site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2010/05/05/from-google-oblivion-to-page-1-in-2-weeks-for-homeopathic-vet-site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 13:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News about Retiarius Internet Clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News from Retiarius Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative-vet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeopathic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retiarius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retiarius Internet Design recently were commissioned to upgrade and redesign the site of alternative-vet.co.uk, London&#8217;s leading homoeopathic veterinary surgeon Lise Hansen. A careful redesign, optimising keyword density, meta statements, page titles, page names etc, whilst retaining the look and feel of the original site, has achieved the required page 1 listing in Google.co.uk for the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2010/05/05/from-google-oblivion-to-page-1-in-2-weeks-for-homeopathic-vet-site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 must have add-ons and plugins for WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2009/06/04/top-10-must-have-add-ons-and-plugins-for-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2009/06/04/top-10-must-have-add-ons-and-plugins-for-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site design techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WordPress is one the most popular blogging platforms in use today. It has many advantages for site owners wanting a search engine optimised web site. It is free, open source and therefore secure. Just download WordPress free from here It is easy to use and maintain It runs on Apache web servers It has many [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2009/06/04/top-10-must-have-add-ons-and-plugins-for-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO companies that use link farms to gain placement &#8211; a good or bad idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuffing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google started the trend, but more and more search engines are following suit and using link popularity as an important part of their ranking algorithms. Many webmasters have responded by joining link farms and stuffing their sites with as many links as possible. This worked for a while regarding site placement but now the search [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google spell checking &#8211; and how it affects SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/04/google-spell-checking-and-how-it-affects-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/04/google-spell-checking-and-how-it-affects-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been shown by our experience and from our research that Google's spidering and indexing systems place great store on the way a site has been constructed. Google appear to penalise sites with spelling errors and sites with non-compliant HTML/XHTML coding.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/04/google-spell-checking-and-how-it-affects-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

