<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Optimising sites for search engines by Retiarius Internet Design &#187; optimisation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/tag/optimisation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com</link>
	<description>Search engine optimisation (SEO) techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Flash! and their site was gone!</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 19:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Retiarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web site design techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shockwave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Further to my earlier post on not using frames, a company of my acquaintance had a nicely search engine  optimised site. It then seems that someone offered to update their site with a new, experimental, &#8216;jazzy and upbeat&#8217; look. As this was for free they accepted and the new &#8216;designer&#8217; immediately dumped the existing site [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2011/06/25/flash-and-their-site-was-gone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO companies that use link farms to gain placement &#8211; a good or bad idea?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 06:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stuffing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google started the trend, but more and more search engines are following suit and using link popularity as an important part of their ranking algorithms. Many webmasters have responded by joining link farms and stuffing their sites with as many links as possible. This worked for a while regarding site placement but now the search [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/11/02/seo-companies-that-use-link-farms-to-gain-placement-a-good-or-bad-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Choosing an appropriate SEO web site design company</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/29/choosing-an-appropriate-seo-company/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/29/choosing-an-appropriate-seo-company/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Retiarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site design techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever a client approaches us about optimising their site and they say &#8220;we have had xyz.com optimise it but we still don&#8217;t have placement&#8221; I always have a look at xyz.com&#8217;s website to see if they have optimised their own site. Despite what their site may say for human readers, the fancy graphics, Flash animations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/29/choosing-an-appropriate-seo-company/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The benefits of using subdomains to enhance SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/08/the-benefits-of-using-subdomains-to-enhance-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/08/the-benefits-of-using-subdomains-to-enhance-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Retiarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web site design techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subdomain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By using a subdomain for a blog, and cross-linking a new primary site to it you automatically have set up some linking value to the new primary site. If the blog is sued as 'link bait' with articles likely to interest a lot of readers then you can increase the cross-traffic to the, probably less frequently updated, primary site.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/08/the-benefits-of-using-subdomains-to-enhance-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>W3C compliance &#8211; is it important for SEO?</title>
		<link>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/06/w3c-compliance-is-it-important-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/06/w3c-compliance-is-it-important-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 06:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Retiarius</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimisation Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retiarius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w3C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A well written, W3C complaint coded site can be fully read by the search engine systems and as such, if two sites of equal stature are to be ranked, one compliant and one not, the compliant site will rank higher.  Which would you choose if you were employing a designer?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchengineoptimising.retiarius.com/2008/10/06/w3c-compliance-is-it-important-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

